MRCP Anatomy: Spinal Cord Tracts (MRCP Part 1)
- Crack Medicine

- 11 hours ago
- 4 min read
TL;DR
For MRCP Part 1, spinal cord tract questions are about localisation, not drawing diagrams. If you understand what each tract carries, where it crosses, and the clinical deficit it produces, you can solve most questions in seconds. This article distils the examinable scope, high-yield tracts, classic traps, and a short MRCP-style case.
Why spinal cord tracts matter in MRCP Part 1
Spinal cord anatomy is one of the most predictable yet commonly misunderstood areas tested in MRCP Part 1. The exam does not reward memorising labelled cross-sections; instead, it repeatedly tests your ability to translate a short clinical vignette into an anatomical localisation.
A typical question might describe asymmetric weakness, selective sensory loss, or bladder involvement and ask where the lesion lies. If you can mentally map symptoms to tracts, you gain a reliable scoring area that links anatomy, neurology, and physiology.
This post supports the main MRCP Part 1 overview and is designed to be used alongside question practice from the Crack Medicine QBank.
Examinable scope: what MRCP actually expects
MRCP Part 1 focuses on core long tracts, not obscure pathways. You should be comfortable with:
Function of each major tract
Level and pattern of decussation
Ipsilateral vs contralateral deficits
Classical cord syndromes
You are not expected to memorise segmental lamination or rare named tracts.
The 5 most tested spinal cord tracts
1. Corticospinal tract
Function: Voluntary motor controlCrossing: Pyramidal decussation in the caudal medulla
Lesion above decussation → contralateral UMN weakness
Lesion below decussation (spinal cord) → ipsilateral UMN signs below lesion
Early spinal cord injury may cause temporary flaccidity (spinal shock)
Exam pearl: Increased tone, brisk reflexes, and extensor plantar response point to corticospinal involvement.
2. Dorsal columns (posterior columns)
Function: Vibration, proprioception, fine touchComponents:
Fasciculus gracilis (lower limb, medial)
Fasciculus cuneatus (upper limb, lateral)
Crossing: Medulla (internal arcuate fibres)
Spinal cord lesion → ipsilateral loss below the level
Sensory ataxia and positive Romberg sign are key clues
3. Spinothalamic tract
Function: Pain and temperatureCrossing: 1–2 spinal segments above entry via anterior white commissure
Cord lesion → contralateral loss beginning a few levels below
Central cord lesions affect this tract early
Classic trap: Pain loss does not start exactly at the level of the lesion.
4. Spinocerebellar tracts
Function: Unconscious proprioception and coordinationCrossing: Mostly uncrossed (or double-crossed)
Lesions cause ipsilateral limb ataxia
Tested infrequently and usually as part of broader cord pathology
5. Autonomic pathways
Function: Sympathetic and parasympathetic control
Lesions above T6 → risk of autonomic dysreflexia
Sacral cord involvement → bladder, bowel, sexual dysfunction
Often used to help localise level, not as isolated questions
High-yield summary table
Tract | Modality | Crossing point | Deficit in spinal cord lesion |
Corticospinal | Motor | Medulla | Ipsilateral UMN signs below |
Dorsal columns | Vibration, proprioception | Medulla | Ipsilateral loss below |
Spinothalamic | Pain, temperature | 1–2 levels above entry | Contralateral loss below |
Spinocerebellar | Coordination | Mostly uncrossed | Ipsilateral ataxia |

Core syndromes examiners love
Brown-Séquard syndrome (hemisection)
This is one of the highest-yield applications of spinal tract anatomy in MRCP Part 1.
Ipsilateral:
UMN weakness (corticospinal)
Loss of vibration and proprioception (dorsal columns)
Contralateral:
Loss of pain and temperature starting a few levels below
Typical stem: Penetrating trauma, unilateral compression, tumour.
Central cord syndrome / syringomyelia
Early bilateral loss of pain and temperature in a “cape-like” distribution
Dorsal columns initially spared
Due to damage at the anterior white commissure
Mini-case (MRCP-style question)
Question A 29-year-old man presents after a stab injury to the right side of his thoracic spine. Examination shows right-sided spastic weakness below T9, loss of vibration sense on the right below T9, and loss of pain sensation on the left starting from T11 downwards. Where is the lesion?
Answer Right-sided hemisection of the spinal cord at T9.
Explanation
Ipsilateral UMN signs → corticospinal tract below decussation
Ipsilateral vibration loss → dorsal column involvement
Contralateral pain loss beginning below the lesion → spinothalamic crossing pattern
This is a classic MRCP Part 1 localisation question.
10 high-yield points to remember
Spinal cord lesions cause ipsilateral UMN signs below the lesion.
Pain and temperature cross early in the spinal cord.
Vibration and proprioception cross in the medulla.
Spinothalamic loss starts a few segments below the lesion.
Brown-Séquard = ipsilateral motor + contralateral pain loss.
Central cord lesions affect pain and temperature first.
Posterior column damage causes sensory ataxia.
Autonomic symptoms help identify lesion level.
Think in patterns, not isolated deficits.
Always ask: Which side? Which modality? Where does it cross?
Common mistakes (and how to avoid them)
Mixing up UMN and LMN signs → always check reflexes and tone
Assuming all tracts cross at the same level
Forgetting delayed spinothalamic crossing
Over-focusing on rare tracts instead of core pathways
Ignoring bladder or autonomic clues
Practical study checklist
Revise tracts alongside clinical deficits, not diagrams alone
Link each tract to one classic syndrome
Practise localisation questions using the Crack Medicine QBank
Review explanations carefully, not just scores
Test readiness with full papers from Crack Medicine Mock Tests
FAQs
Which spinal cord tracts are most important for MRCP Part 1?
Corticospinal, dorsal column, and spinothalamic tracts account for the majority of questions.
Do I need to memorise spinal cord cross-sections?
No. Understanding function, crossing, and clinical patterns is sufficient.
Is Brown-Séquard syndrome commonly tested?
Yes. It is one of the most reliable ways examiners assess tract anatomy.
How is pain and temperature loss typically tested?
As contralateral loss beginning a few segments below the lesion.
Ready to start?
Spinal cord tracts are a high-yield, low-risk area for MRCP Part 1 if approached clinically. Focus on localisation, practise pattern recognition, and integrate anatomy with short vignettes.
Start with the MRCP Part 1 hub, reinforce learning using the QBank, and benchmark your progress with Mock Tests.
Sources
MRCP(UK) Examination Syllabushttps://www.mrcpuk.org/mrcpuk-examinations/part-1
Blumenfeld H. Neuroanatomy Through Clinical Cases. Oxford University Press
Snell RS. Clinical Neuroanatomy. Wolters Kluwer



Comments