Cancer Genetics: Oncogenes & Tumour Suppressors — MRCP Part 1 Exam Classics
- Crack Medicine

- 16m
- 3 min read
TL;DR
Cancer genetics is a high-yield MRCP Part 1 topic that repeatedly tests whether you can distinguish oncogenes from tumour suppressor genes. The exam focuses on mechanisms (gain vs loss of function), inheritance patterns, and classic gene–cancer associations. Mastering these principles prevents common traps and secures straightforward marks.
Why this topic matters in MRCP Part 1
Cancer genetics underpins questions across oncology, haematology, endocrinology, and even general medicine. MRCP Part 1 rarely asks for laboratory techniques or experimental pathways; instead, it tests whether you understand how genetic alterations drive malignant transformation and how those mechanisms translate into clinical patterns.
Most candidates lose marks not because the topic is obscure, but because they confuse oncogenes with tumour suppressor genes, particularly when inheritance and allele number are tested together.
For the wider exam framework, see the official MRCP(UK) examination overview:https://www.mrcpuk.org/mrcpuk-examinations/part-1
Scope of cancer genetics you are expected to know
For MRCP Part 1, the examinable scope is deliberately limited and principle-based:
Definitions and core differences
Gain-of-function vs loss-of-function mutations
One-hit vs two-hit models
Key examples and their associated malignancies
Basic cell-cycle checkpoints and DNA repair concepts
You are not expected to memorise detailed signalling cascades or molecular assays.
Oncogenes vs tumour suppressor genes: the essential contrasts
1. Mechanism of action
Oncogenes: Gain of function. A proto-oncogene becomes constitutively active.
Tumour suppressor genes: Loss of function. Normal growth-inhibitory control is removed.
2. Number of alleles required
Oncogenes: One mutated allele is sufficient to drive abnormal proliferation.
Tumour suppressor genes: Both alleles must be inactivated (Knudson’s two-hit hypothesis).
3. Inheritance pattern
Oncogenes: Typically sporadic mutations.
Tumour suppressor genes: Often inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, but with recessive behaviour at the cellular level.
4. Normal physiological role
Oncogenes: Promote cell growth, division, or survival.
Tumour suppressors: Restrain the cell cycle, repair DNA, or trigger apoptosis.
High-yield comparison table
Feature | Oncogenes | Tumour suppressor genes |
Normal role | Stimulate controlled growth | Inhibit growth / repair DNA |
Mutation effect | Gain of function | Loss of function |
Alleles needed | One | Two |
Typical inheritance | Sporadic | Often inherited (AD clinically) |
Classic examples | RAS, MYC | TP53, RB1, APC |
This table alone accounts for a large proportion of MRCP Part 1 genetics marks.
The five most tested cancer genetics subtopics
RAS oncogene activation Constitutive signalling independent of growth factors.
TP53 (“guardian of the genome”)Causes G1/S arrest and promotes DNA repair or apoptosis after damage.
RB gene and cell-cycle control Loss leads to unchecked transition from G1 to S phase.
APC gene and colorectal cancer Dysregulation of β-catenin signalling and adenoma formation.
BRCA1/BRCA2 and DNA repair Defective homologous recombination with increased breast and ovarian cancer risk.
These topics frequently appear as single best answer (SBA) questions.

Mini-case (MRCP-style SBA)
Question: A 30-year-old man has a family history of early-onset colorectal cancer. Genetic testing reveals a germline mutation in a gene responsible for regulating β-catenin levels. Which statement best explains how cancer develops in this condition?
Correct answer: Both alleles of a tumour suppressor gene must be inactivated.
Explanation: This describes an APC mutation. Although the condition is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, malignant transformation requires a second somatic hit. MRCP Part 1 commonly tests this distinction between clinical inheritance and cellular behaviour.
For structured practice on similar questions, use a dedicated MRCP question bank such as:https://www.passmedicine.com/mrcporhttps://www.onexamination.com/mrcp-part-1
Five common exam traps to avoid
Assuming autosomal dominant inheritance means one mutated allele is sufficient at the cellular level
Confusing oncogenes and tumour suppressors based only on cancer association
Forgetting that TP53 primarily causes cell-cycle arrest before apoptosis
Mixing up DNA repair genes with checkpoint regulators
Over-interpreting molecular detail not required by the question stem
Practical study-tip checklist
Classify the gene first: oncogene or tumour suppressor
Decide whether the mutation causes gain or loss of function
Ask how many alleles must be affected
Link each gene to one classic cancer association
Practise timed SBAs to reinforce pattern recognition
Short, repeated revision is far more effective than reading advanced molecular texts.
FAQs (People Also Ask)
What is the key difference between oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes?
Oncogenes act through gain of function and require only one mutated allele, whereas tumour suppressor genes require loss of both alleles.
Are tumour suppressor gene disorders autosomal recessive?
Clinically they appear autosomal dominant, but at the cellular level both alleles must be inactivated.
Is detailed molecular genetics examined in MRCP Part 1?
No. The exam focuses on mechanisms, inheritance patterns, and classic associations.
How frequently is cancer genetics tested in MRCP Part 1?
It appears regularly, often integrated into oncology and general medicine questions.
Ready to start?
Consolidate this topic by answering timed SBAs and reviewing explanations. Use the MRCP Part 1 overview to place cancer genetics within your wider revision plan, and reinforce learning through targeted practice in the question bank or structured lectures.
Sources
MRCP(UK) Examination Blueprint: https://www.mrcpuk.org
Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease.
NICE Genomic Medicine overview: https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/nice-guidelines/genomic-medicine



Comments